Monday, January 16, 2012

REVISITING 901



TIME FOR A NEW INVESTIGATION AND TRIAL?

So what of the questions still hovering over Najib? Given that the Prime Minister has himself finally admitted to giving two misleading statements, which might have seriously perverted the course of justice against Anwar Ibrahim, surely it is now Najib who should be facing an investigation into whether he entered into a conspiracy to defame and imprison his political opponent?


Since the evidence is so glaring and so much of it has been supplied by Najib himself, it would be a complete negligence by the forces of law and order if they failed to launch a thorough examination of the whole affair.

Now, that would be the genuine test of how objective the police force and judiciary of Malaysia are!

Events leading to the above question HERE.


HOLD THE ACCOLADES.

This sordid trial reveals everything that is rotten with the Malaysian system of justice. This case should never have been prosecuted in the first place. That it was reflected the level or more precisely lack of professionalism on the part of these career prosecutors. As for the trial, there were many instances where the judge could have thrown the case out, as when the physical evidence was introduced. Now the learned judge used that as the reason for acquittal.

As for Anwar Ibrahim, he and his family are rightfully grateful for the verdict, but hold on to your apology. Forgiveness, yes, as he said recently; that is always praiseworthy. He rightly cautioned that one court decision does not a judicial spring make. Besides, there is still the monumental task ahead to clear up the mess, and not just in the system of justice. Najib’s much-ballyhooed “transformation” is a charade concocted by his exorbitantly-paid consultants.

WHY HOLD THE ACCOLADES?

HERE

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hey! Don't b so naive!

The only time they will ever investigate Najib and the rest of this band of circus performers will be when Pakatan takes over the federal government.

By then, Najib and gang would have fled town.

Good try!

Anonymous said...

When is a History Prof a Historian?
when his-story a about the past is past tense
....dedicate to senile history prof